If loquats cost 300,000 Liras per kilo, what if they were not loquats? 

"My brother", we have nothing to do with the price, in both cases the "outsider" citizen will not be able to buy it, he will only ask questions. Therefore, the most puzzling question remains, why is the price so unrealistic when it is a locally produced product? (two exclamation marks)

So how can the "normal" citizen have a salary that can't buy a kilo of loquats but can buy a kilo of chicken, and in both cases he lives the rest of the month barely getting by, even though the first is fruit and the second is meat, it should be noted, because of an old and still ongoing dispute between meat and some types of fruit with the citizen.  

The citizen considers this tree to be watered from Zamzam water, so its price is high. But upon seeing its price, he discovers the benefit of tooth extraction, in addition to apologizing to tomatoes, bananas, and in the land of wonders "we will see loquats and yams".  

Is it conceivable that there is no price control for a single commodity, even if it does not fall under the commodities priced by the Ministry? But has it come to the point where the farmer has room to arbitrarily price a commodity?  

It is true that the law of commerce and pricing is based on the principle of "supply and demand", which often makes its price so high. But logically, its cost may not be significant compared to this price.  

The loquat season usually lasts only one month, during which domestic communities compete to buy them, coinciding with the spread of loquat stands in the streets.